Impact of insurance payer and socioeconomic status on type of autologous breast reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous breast reconstruction has evolved from more morbid procedures that sacrificed the abdominal muscle (the TRAM or transverse rectus abdominus muscle flap) to "perforator" flaps. Commercial insurers recognized the higher technical demand of perforator flaps by creating procedural codes with higher professional fees. This study examined whether procedure code discrepancies between insurance payers disproportionally incentivize perforator flaps among the commercially insured. METHODS: Autologous breast reconstructions identified from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) were subdivided into microvascular perforator (85.74, 85.75, 85.76), microvascular TRAM (85.73), and pedicled TRAM flaps (85.72). Demographics, comorbidities and access to care were compared. A logistic regression comparing microvascular reconstructions only was used to identify predictors for perforator flap reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 66,968 cases of autologous breast reconstruction were identified. Perforator flaps were more likely among the commercially insured (p < 0.001) and higher insurance quartiles (p < 0.001).When comparing microvascular reconstruction, perforator flaps were 1.72 (p < 0.001) times more likely among the commercially insured. As compared to the lowest income quartile, the fourth quartile had an odds ratio of 1.36 (p < 0.001) for perforator flap reconstruction. CONCLUSION: The presence of a separate perforator flap billing code among the commercially insured may be exacerbating existing socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer reconstruction.

Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Open Skull Base Surgery in Pediatric Patients.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To characterize the pathology and outcomes of skull base surgery in the pediatric population by open versus endoscopic surgical approach. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients (<18 years) who underwent skull base surgery for nonmalignant disease from May 2000 to August 2019 was performed. Patient demographics, pathology, and operative characteristics by surgical approach were recorded and analyzed. Patients with a combined endoscopic/open approach were classified as open for the analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-two pediatric skull base patients were identified with a mean age of 11.3 years (standard deviation 5.2). A purely endoscopic approach was used in 63 (77%) patients, a purely open approach was used in nine (11%) patients, and a combined open/endoscopic approach was used in 10 (12%) patients. The all-cause complication rate was 9.8%. There was no statistically significant difference in rate of complications between patients with an open versus endoscopic approach for resection (15.8% vs. 7.9%; P = .379). Risk of having a complication did not significantly vary by patient age. The odds of having a complication with an open approach was not statistically significant in a multivariable model adjusted for age, sex, race, intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, tracheostomy requirement, and vascular flap use (odds ratio 2.76, 95% confidence interval 0.28-26.94; P = .383). CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study demonstrates a similar risk of complication for open versus endoscopic approach to resection in pediatric skull base patients at our institution. Safety and feasibility of the endoscopic approach has previously been demonstrated in children, and this is the first study to directly compare outcomes with open approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:996-1001, 2021.

A structured pathway for accelerated postoperative recovery reduces hospital stay and cost of care following microvascular breast reconstruction without increased complications.

INTRODUCTION: Accelerated recovery protocols have proved effective in many surgical procedures but are infrequently applied in breast reconstruction. In this study, we evaluate the impact of a structured pathway for accelerated postoperative recovery in patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction at a high-volume center. METHODS: We describe our care pathway for patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction at our center. We compared length of stay (LOS), complication rates, readmission rates, and cost of inpatient care before (pre-protocol (Pre-P)) and after (post-protocol (Post-P)) the implementation of the protocol. RESULTS: Patients in the Post-P group (n = 198) had a significant reduction in mean LOS as compared to those in the Pre-P (n = 183) group (3.6 +/- 0.85 vs. 4.7 +/-1.04 days, p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in the rates of major (Pre-P 16.9% vs. Post-P 14.7%, p = 0.71) or minor (Pre-P 21.3% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.22) postoperative complications between groups. The readmission rates were also similar (Pre-P 6.5% vs. Post-P 4.5, p = 0.69). Implementation of the protocol resulted in a significant reduction in the mean cost of in-patient care. CONCLUSION: A simple protocol for accelerated and streamlined postoperative recovery effectively reduces LOS and patient care costs following DIEP flap breast reconstruction without compromising patient safety.

The reconstructive journey: Description of the breast reconstruction pathway in a high-volume UK-based microsurgical centre.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous breast reconstruction, on its own, is a complex microsurgical procedure. However, this operation is usually just one of a series of steps along a patient's reconstructive journey. This includes not only a primary major surgical event but also the consequent recovery, potential complications and secondary surgeries required to optimise the final outcome. Unfortunately, there is limited information of what patients can expect from this reconstructive journey in the literature. The aim of this study was to characterise the journey of a consecutive cohort of patients through their whole reconstructive pathway in a high-volume UK-based breast reconstruction service. METHODS: A retrospective case analysis was undertaken including all the patients who had an autologous breast reconstruction at the Queen Victoria Hospital in East Grinstead between January 2012 and December 2014. Their case notes were reviewed from their initial referral to their final discharge. Number of operations, complication rates and time required to complete their journey were recorded, as well as differences between different flap options, immediate versus delayed and unilateral versus bilateral breast reconstructions. RESULTS: A total of 409 autologous breast reconstruction cases were performed in the 3-year study period. The vast majority of breast reconstructions used a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (81.5%), with muscle-sparing transverse abdominal flaps (14.6%) and transverse upper gracilis flaps (3.9%) being the other options utilised. Free flap success was observed in 99.5% cases. Almost all patients opted for subsequent surgery (94%) of any kind. Only 75% opted for the reconstruction of their nipples. On average, 3.20 procedures were required per patient on this cohort, and these procedures were performed in 1.5 surgical episodes on average. Bilateral reconstructions reached the discharge point sooner than unilateral reconstructions and required a smaller number of operations. The average time to complete the reconstructive journey was 20.8 months. DISCUSSION: Patient-centred decision-making is fundamental to select the correct intervention for each patient and empower her in her healing journey. Standard measuring of patient satisfaction is still an unaccomplished goal in our unit.

Current practice and short-term outcomes of therapeutic mammaplasty in the international TeaM multicentre prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic mammaplasty, which combines breast reduction and mastopexy techniques with tumour excision, may extend the boundaries of breast-conserving surgery and improve outcomes for patients, but current practice is unknown and high-quality outcome data are lacking. This prospective multicentre cohort study aimed to explore the practice and short-term outcomes of the technique. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing therapeutic mammaplasty at participating centres between 1 September 2016 and 30 June 2017 were recruited to the study. Demographic, preoperative, operative, oncological and complication data were collected. The primary outcome was unplanned reoperation for complications within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included re-excision rates and time to adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Overall, 880 patients underwent 899 therapeutic mammaplasty procedures at 50 centres. The most common indications were avoidance of poor cosmetic outcomes associated with standard breast-conserving surgery (702 procedures, 78·1 per cent) or avoidance of mastectomy (379, 42·2 per cent). Wise-pattern skin incisions were the most common (429 of 899, 47·7 per cent), but a range of incisions and nipple-areola pedicles were used. Immediate contralateral symmetrization was performed in one-third of cases (284 of 880, 32·3 per cent). In total, 205 patients (23·3 per cent) developed a complication, but only 25 (2·8 per cent) required reoperation. Median postoperative lesion size was 24·5 (i.q.r. 16-38) mm. Incomplete excision was seen in 132 procedures (14·7 per cent), but completion mastectomy was required for only 51 lesions (5·7 per cent). Median time to adjuvant therapy was 54 (i.q.r. 42-66) days. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic mammaplasty is a safe and effective alternative to mastectomy or standard breast-conserving surgery. Further work is required to explore the impact of the technique on quality of life, and to establish cost-effectiveness.

Evolving Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Is the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Taking Over?

BACKGROUND: Enthusiasm for the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap for autologous breast reconstruction has grown in recent years. However, this flap is not performed at all centers or by all plastic surgeons for breast reconstruction, and it is unclear whether practice patterns have measurably changed. This study aimed to (1) evaluate changing trends in breast flap use in the United States in recent years and (2) identify how these trends have affected charges and costs associated with autologous breast reconstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction [latissimus dorsi (LD), pedicled transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous (pTRAM), free TRAM (fTRAM), and DIEP] were identified using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2009-2011). A total of 19,182 hospital discharges were reviewed. Patient demographics, hospital teaching center status, payer status, length of stay, total charges, and total costs per discharge were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed using linear regression, t test, and analysis of variance models. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2011, the total number of discharges did not change significantly. Patient age distribution was similar for all flap groups. For individual flaps, there was a significant increase in DIEP flaps (P = 0.03), with a decreasing trend for other abdominal-based flaps. The patients receiving DIEP flap breast reconstruction were covered by private insurance at a higher rate than all other flap procedures (P = 0.03), whereas other potential cost determinants did not differ significantly between the groups. The mean charge per flap was $40,704 for LD, $51,933 for pTRAM, $69,909 for fTRAM, and $82,320 for DIEP. The mean cost per flap was $12,017 for LD, $15,538 for pTRAM, $20,756 for fTRAM, and $23,616 for DIEP. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2009 and 2011, the total amount of autologous breast reconstruction discharges was relatively stable, but the number of DIEP flaps increased significantly. Review of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample data shows that, compared with LD, pTRAM, and fTRAM flaps, the DIEP flap is associated with higher charges and costs.